Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 14:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 277
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 889
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,397
86% 1,397 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 143
Parallax 133
99% 133 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
93% 115 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 151
Mixed 174
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 33.3
135% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 158
123% 172 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
344GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 354 77 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 490
Write 446
Mixed 403
SusWrite 152
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 45.5
155% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX2933C15D4/8GX KHX2933C15D4/8GX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 28.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback