Lenovo 80WQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 121
48% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 195
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 5.7
4% 6.67 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L2 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 124 128 130 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
65% Good
Read 408
Write 339
Mixed 290
SusWrite 131
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 26.5
90% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 267
205% 281 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65%
Great: 102%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 111 112 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61% Good
Read 100
Write 99.8
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 112
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Z-2G3B1 1B Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WQ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback