Asrock B560M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 00:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 734
71% 585 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
MSI(1462 3892) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 259
Parallax 327
240% 294 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 242
Splatting 177
192% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 707
Write 677
Mixed 54.2
105% 479 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 5.5
51% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 58.8
113% 244 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 310%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
116GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 408 443 458 464 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 120
Mixed 402
SusWrite 444
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 42.2
146% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 283
234% 335 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZKW 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 27.8
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback