Asus P5E-V HDMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P5E-V HDMI  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 23:32
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 94.2
44% 70 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 179
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1694 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 131
Parallax 116
92% 120 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 113
Splatting 105
90% 110 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 204 214 183 87 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 195
Write 198
Mixed 185
SusWrite 157
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 27.6
100% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 103
81% 114 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 102%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
12GB free
Firmware: UE45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 196
Write 150
Mixed 165
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 13.5
42% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
10GB free
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 63 15 53 18 3.5 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 185
Write 151
Mixed 121
SusWrite 50
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 8.7
29% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 46.2
DQ Mixed 33.5
37% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5E-V HDMI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P5E-V HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback