Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0YJPT1
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 21:45
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 240
33% 243 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 87.4
52% 72 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 47.4
50% 63 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R530F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 218 244 249 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 423
Write 262
Mixed 271
SusWrite 231
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 24.6
84% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 188
147% 198 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 211%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
107GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 151 163 170 160 161 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.8% Above average
Read 232
Write 220
Mixed 203
SusWrite 158
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 21.1
78% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 148
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA100V 1TB
737GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.8% Very poor
Read 54.6
Write 25
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 15.2
36% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 48%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
27GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.9 1.4 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 53.3
Write 25.1
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 1.2
28% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
47% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 43%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-753CA1 500GB
335GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.7 8.3 9.3 9.5 9.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 8313 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback