HP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 289
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 137
Parallax 240
93% 164 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 120
Splatting 180
141% 173 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 369 365 430 350 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 422
Mixed 354
SusWrite 355
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 47.8
155% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 157
168% 280 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S1MBP-4 HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 560-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback