Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10c 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 24.3 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 44.6 22% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 73.4 8-Core 83.6 10% 78.5 Pts	64-Core 82.6 5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 066B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.57% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.8 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.57% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LJT-256L6G-11 M.2 2260 256GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: DJ8110C SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 233 253 268 272 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 320 Write 266 Mixed 213 SusWrite 269 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 12.4 42% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 91.9 85% 133 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron A0B4CDD4C6B2B5B6B6B4C8DAADB1C7B6C5B1 2x2GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 291 14% 291 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	86x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 72%, 1,324 samples	26x
LJH-128V2G-11 M.2 2260 128GBLiteonBench 57%, 138 samples	19x
LJH-256V2G-11 M.2 2260 256GBLiteonBench 70%, 129 samples	14x

RAM
A0B4CDD4C6B2B5B6B6B4C8DAADB1C7B6C5B1 2x2GBMicronBench 44%, 138 samples	20x
C8CDD4B4B2B5D3B6C1C6D2B6C1ADD0C2A0A0 2x2GBHynixBench 44%, 162 samples	17x
808080808080808080808080808080808080 2x4GBHynixBench 44%, 118 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16