Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T48E 73 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Memory 22.8 1-Core 12.3 2-Core 17 12% 17.4 Pts	4-Core 18.1 8-Core 17.9 2% 18 Pts	64-Core 15.5 1% 15.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 1,583 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9804) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 110 112 106 126 131 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.8% Very poor	Read 76 Write 107 Mixed 93.4 SusWrite 121 23% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 6.4 23% 7.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 33.4 DQ Mixed 30.6 23% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4D34373142353237 1x4GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 300 13% 300 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T48EAMDBench 26%, 73 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6200 series GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 54 samples	1x

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $193

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16