HP p7-1132

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1132  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACD
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 02:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3600 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 68.5
38% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 112
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB
CLim: 1352 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.1% Below average
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 46.6
29% 40.3 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 44.1
Splatting 35.2
35% 43.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 159 162 170 174 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 226
Write 210
Mixed 202
SusWrite 162
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 30.3
100% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 158
120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1132 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback