ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G9-793 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Challenger2_SKS
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170713
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '17 at 23:04
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 548 56% 452 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	76.8% Very good	Lighting 93.6 Reflection 110 Parallax 90.1 76% 97.8 fps	MRender 89.2 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 100 78% 94 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB 13,747 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 959 Write 351 Mixed 521 134% 610 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 23.1 89% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 55.2 DQ Mixed 13.4 17% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 237%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 733GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 168 168 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 202 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 147 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 117 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2137 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 180389216286 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	69.9% Good	Read 133 Write 111 Mixed 134 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.22 87% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB 11,019 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 22 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	313x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	208x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	450x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	80x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 47%, 22,284 samples	1x

SSD
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	86x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	47x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	46x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples	112x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	102x
ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 77%, 566 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback