Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 82.8 30% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 30.9 8-Core 109 8% 70.1 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0506) 1GB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.54 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kimmidi TB900 128GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW210715 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 157 87 160 165 196 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 388 Write 361 Mixed 180 SusWrite 171 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 8.7 54% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 81.8 DQ Write 81 DQ Mixed 13.5 29% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GB 4,855 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.2 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	131x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	48x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	15x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	10x
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GBKingstonBench 21%, 403 samples	8x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 1,624 samples	7x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16