Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHP (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '23 at 19:41
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$120 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 215 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 484 58% 448 Pts	64-Core 625 39% 625 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Sapphire(174B 2438) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.60 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 63.1 0% 40.4 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 66.9 Splatting 63.2 53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 98GB free Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 74 83 74 77 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 188 Write 82 Mixed 108 SusWrite 75.6 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 8.2 44% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 84.7 DQ Mixed 67.5 62% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 898GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 157 161 154 151 154 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 149 Write 172 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 153 91% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD4AGU880-26N1900 1x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	358x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	287x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	66x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 4,742 samples	23x
BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 189 samples	16x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $303

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16