Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

15 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 12.5 1-Core 49 2-Core 77.3 24% 46.3 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 75.2 14% 96.8 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.6 1% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed K7N8-256GF 256GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEA2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 54 143 92 104 133 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 274 Write 82.9 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 107 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 8.9 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 20.1 DQ Mixed 18.3 15% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 7.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 381 10% 381 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	89x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	50x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	35x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	162x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	85x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	37x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	146x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	28x
DDR4 NB 16G 2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 35 samples	25x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16