Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582ZM_UX582ZM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582ZM_UX582ZM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX582ZM
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 550 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 17:33
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 69
1-Core 188
2-Core 364
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,041
104% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,665
103% 1,665 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1A9C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 111
Parallax 115
101% 117 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 77.2
78% 97.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1727 1935 2007 2207 2254 2279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2913
Write 2,028
Mixed 1,854
SusWrite 2068
496% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 69.8
223% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 695
491% 632 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 339%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 53
155% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 24.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 140%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Pro Duo UX582ZM_UX582ZM Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582ZM_UX582ZM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback