Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100305
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 17:30
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 140
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 226
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
XFX(1682 3050) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 70 72 72 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 173
Write 120
Mixed 137
SusWrite 70
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 17.7
57% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 35.4
DQ Mixed 24.3
19% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
219GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 72 72 72 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 176
Write 116
Mixed 135
SusWrite 71
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 17.7
57% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 35.1
DQ Mixed 23.7
19% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
298GB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 81 83 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 75.3
Write 83.6
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 81.9
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
2TB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 138 137 144 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 143
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 140
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD3 Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback