Default X670E Pro RS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 418%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 433%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics356% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault X670E Pro RS  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Pro RS
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 10:44
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$231
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 213
2-Core 422
127% 243 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,549
141% 1,183 Pts
64-Core 1,869
116% 1,869 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 123%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3420 MHz, MLim: 6115 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
356% Outstanding
Lighting 563
Reflection 528
Parallax 652
459% 581 fps
MRender 473
Gravity 568
Splatting 267
340% 436 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 356%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
503GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2767 2075 1884 2138 2000 2150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,725
Write 4,188
Mixed 3,113
SusWrite 2,169
690% 3,049 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 114
394% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 1,714
DQ Write 1,340
DQ Mixed 1,508
1,133% 1,521 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 431%
Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-7200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
187% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 71.3
MC Mixed 70.1
193% 67.5 GB/s
SC Read 58.8
SC Write 64.1
SC Mixed 66
180% 63 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 187%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X670E Pro RS Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO

System: Default X670E Pro RS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback