Lenovo 10SFS0C700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10SFS0C700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3132
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 10:41
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 786
80% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Device(1642 1865) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 20.8
0% 16.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 20
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDATB8Y256G1001 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40102101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 208 204 154 214 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 480
Write 284
Mixed 195
SusWrite 207
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 41.7
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 191
177% 276 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10SFS0C700 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10SFS0C700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback