Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220305
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 76.2
1-Core 166
2-Core 301
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 956
92% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,147
71% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 7500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 156
Parallax 158
133% 159 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
119% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1333
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,470
341% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 89.5
296% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,536
DQ Write 1,186
DQ Mixed 1,208
945% 1,310 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Hfs512g3 9TND-N210A 512GB
323GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 295 159 239 305 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 318
Write 339
Mixed 232
SusWrite 263
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 19.4
69% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 147
107% 138 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 56%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
946GB free
Firmware: SDM2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.4
Write 111
Mixed 59.3
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
760GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 74 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 70.1
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 74.8
86% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 38.6
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback