Clevo W150HNM/W170HN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemClevo W150HNM/W170HN  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W150HNM/W170HN
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 18:17
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 82
2-Core 158
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 352
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5140) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA18.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 322 228 224 224 227 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 300
Write 105
Mixed 247
SusWrite 270
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 30.5
108% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 228
193% 279 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1333S364L9S/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W150HNM/W170HN Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W150HNM/W170HN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback