Zoostorm 7200-0037B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-0037B  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 16:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 150
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 199
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 17.5
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.1
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 111 317 412 453 453 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 129
Write 87.9
Mixed 317
SusWrite 295
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 13.2
59% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 60.9
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 20.9
20% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
220GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 95.4
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSP38G16002 1302 PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-0037B Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-0037B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback