Lenovo 10A6S041PB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10A6S041PB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 344
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6.6
6% 7.47 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 8
Splatting 7
6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Polion 120GB 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 331 338 158 159 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 240
Write 317
Mixed 269
SusWrite 244
61% 268 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 29.5
103% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 90.1
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 135
120% 172 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 88%
Intel HBRPEKNX0101AH 256GB
227GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 307 305 313 315 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 326
Write 225
Mixed 271
SusWrite 309
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 45.4
158% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 211
163% 218 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 9905471-006.A02LF 10GB
1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A6S041PB Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A6S041PB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback