Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 346%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 452%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics303% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive470% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 22:21
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$490
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 209
2-Core 421
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,650
147% 1,246 Pts
64-Core 3,738
231% 3,738 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$930
Gigabyte(1458 40CC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
303% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 435
Parallax 511
372% 467 fps
MRender 569
Gravity 376
Splatting 271
316% 405 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 303%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2829 3032 3116 3334 3378 3419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
470% Outstanding
Read 2,693
Write 2,327
Mixed 2,530
SusWrite 3,184
606% 2,684 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 102
316% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1690
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1,521
1,144% 1,534 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 470%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B5200C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 59.5
MC Mixed 59.6
175% 61.3 GB/s
SC Read 54.5
SC Write 63.6
SC Mixed 53.9
164% 57.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 169%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback