Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory36.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210217
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 22:19
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 169
2-Core 323
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 882
90% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Nvidia(10DE 1539) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 284
Reflection 241
Parallax 294
231% 273 fps
MRender 324
Gravity 236
Splatting 174
192% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 195%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2ISN2BT512GB 512GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 58 79 6.3 25 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 456
Write 396
Mixed 350
SusWrite 103
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 32.8
122% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 151
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 95%
Flashwar W300 240GB
167GB free
Firmware: RHY07A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 121 113 112 113 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 144
Mixed 916
SusWrite 125
140% 641 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 33.9
185% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 49.6
203% 436 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 145%
Great: 180%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
491GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 145 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 151
Write 152
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 145
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85%
Great: 112%
MD02500-BQDW-RO 250GB
422GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 116 116 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
hp x796w 124GB
62GB free, PID e940
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 9 9 9 9 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 26.1
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 8.3
16% 11 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback