Smbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemSmbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName  (all builds)
MotherboardSmbiosType2_BoardManufacturer SmbiosType2_BoardProductName
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 41.8
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 81.6
33% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 99.9
8-Core 132
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 318 342 301 331 325 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 392
Write 383
Mixed 366
SusWrite 324
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 28
97% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 222
161% 208 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SmbiosType1_SystemProductName Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Smbiostype1_systemmanufacturer SmbiosType1_SystemProductName

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback