Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Memory 21.1 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 71.2 24% 44 Pts	4-Core 81.1 8-Core 83.3 11% 82.2 Pts	64-Core 84.4 5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 08F2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 872GB free Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 432 455 422 637 550 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 722 Write 765 Mixed 804 SusWrite 532 159% 706 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 37 128% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 132 103% 143 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 394%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB 7,899 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 3.1 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 1.5 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 312 13% 312 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5000IntelBench 34%, 12,140 samples	30x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	8x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	30x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	8x

SSD
NVMe LITEON 128GBCl1-3d128-q11Bench 99%, 793 samples	4x
NVMe SK hynix 128GBBc501aBench 95%, 1,682 samples	4x
NVMe TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zms256gBench 87%, 7,395 samples	2x

RAM
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GBUnknownBench 32%, 1,375 samples	10x
KKN2NM-MIE 1x4GBUnknownBench 33%, 763 samples	9x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16