Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KC  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , , , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 11:50
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 748
77% 619 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 112
98% 117 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 92.3
Splatting 82.7
82% 104 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SX8200PNP-512GT- 512GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 619 367 383 523 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 1,823
Mixed 290
SusWrite 482
282% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 73.7
246% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 482
431% 650 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 240%
Great: 290%
Intenso Sata III 480GB
311GB free
Firmware: T0529A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 433 439 442 443 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 450
Mixed 429
SusWrite 431
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 23.5
121% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 33.9
81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 101%
Nvme ADATA SX6000LNP 256GB
186GB free
Firmware: 2s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 881 881 851 840 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 870
Mixed 352
SusWrite 738
188% 851 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 49.6
183% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 277
259% 383 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 179%
Great: 204%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB
304GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 398 398 398 398 379 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 404
Write 400
Mixed 381
SusWrite 394
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 29.5
95% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 153
114% 151 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G5 KC Builds (Compare 1,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback