HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 123%
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 111%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8768
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 20:39
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 211
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 781
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 181
Parallax 184
147% 182 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 158
Splatting 135
129% 161 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 939 1053 1272 891 904 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 1,541
Mixed 1259
SusWrite 986
302% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 49.5
163% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1007
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 825
631% 860 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 214%
Great: 251%
954GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 310 329 352 364 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 379
Write 367
Mixed 363
SusWrite 337
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 152
110% 141 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback