Lenovo 20M9002QMX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20M9002QMX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M9002QMX
Memory9.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 20:16
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 146
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 375
36% 298 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P3200 with Max-Q Design
Legend(17AA 225F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 59.9
54% 68.5 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 57.2
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,587
Write 1,489
Mixed 1,296
325% 1,457 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 33.6
109% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 434
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 359
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
112GB free
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,621
Write 1,531
Mixed 1,370
336% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 36
116% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 383
285% 382 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20M9002QMX Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 20M9002QMX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback