Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 16:44
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 145
47% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 220
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.9 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 339 316 145 142 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 297
Write 289
Mixed 304
SusWrite 232
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 16.4
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 202
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC M471A5244BB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 14.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_R504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback