TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medion ERAZER P6705 MD61344

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion ERAZER P6705 MD61344  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION N857EX1M
Memory1.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 15:25
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 121
53% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 292
31% 246 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 51.5%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 852B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.1
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 9.2
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.52%
 Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 852B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 32.6
31% 33.1 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 25.5
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 29.4%
 Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS256GD9TNG-62A 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 116 125 100 103 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 704
Write 129
Mixed 151
SusWrite 114
59% 275 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 22.7
80% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 194
162% 239 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 71.4%
 Great: 158%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
437GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 36 45 94 102 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 114
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 69.3
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.1
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 39.6%
 Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 57%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ERAZER P6705 MD61344 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Medion ERAZER P6705 MD61344

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples9x
GPU
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples6x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples3x
SSD
HFS256GD9TNG-62A 256GBNvmeBench 119%, 545 samples7x
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GBBench 112%, 7,301 samples1x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples4x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples2x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 863 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback