Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 14:28
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 773
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,938
120% 1,938 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4993) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1595 MHz, MLim: 1880 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 120
Parallax 107
82% 109 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 102
Splatting 93.4
81% 99.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1001 828 782 769 746 736 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,586
Write 2,385
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 810
423% 1,891 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 75.9
253% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 833
598% 777 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 265%
Great: 355%
Seagate FireCuda HDD Hub 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 121
Mixed 86
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
248% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 87 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 90
Write 92.3
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 85.9
107% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 32.2
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 29.8
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback