Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 241%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 10:55
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 293
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,128
100% 849 Pts
64-Core 2,934
182% 2,934 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Asus(1043 04FE) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 274
Parallax 559
209% 363 fps
MRender 416
Gravity 233
Splatting 347
272% 332 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 204%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2831 1789 1785 1788 1789 1805 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,866
Write 3,008
Mixed 2,812
SusWrite 1,964
600% 2,663 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 84.7
289% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 728
545% 731 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 357%
Great: 526%
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 429 443 428 441 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 444
Mixed 405
SusWrite 436
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 40
130% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 187
146% 204 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 113%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
59GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 425 437 424 437 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 433
Mixed 422
SusWrite 432
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 40.2
131% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 190
148% 206 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 115%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 139 140 138 140 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 141
Write 137
Mixed 102
SusWrite 138
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
222% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
184GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 95 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50% Average
Read 80.5
Write 65
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 93.4
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 177 174 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 150
Mixed 166
SusWrite 171
219% 157 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.5
355% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 41.4
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 37.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback