Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 52.2 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 88.1 38% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 157 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 3.9 3% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gloway WAR PRO T300 240G 240GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: W1D01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 131 77 74 67 78 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53% Above average	Read 226 Write 215 Mixed 228 SusWrite 97.6 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 30.2 96% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 173 132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 369GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 113 113 113 115 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 111 Write 113 Mixed 84 SusWrite 112 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9505Intel $250Bench 47%, 2,124 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
WAR PRO T300 240G 240GBGlowayBench 73%, 164 samples	3x
HG6 128GBToshibaBench 79%, 5,641 samples	2x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $170