HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85FA
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 06:33
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 206
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 323
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 85FA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 7.2
5% 14.6 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 331 334 331 327 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,746
Write 1,618
Mixed 1,166
SusWrite 340
272% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 49.2
159% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 464
344% 462 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 161%
Great: 235%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
515GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 93 91 91 95 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 82.6
Write 134
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 91.4
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143SB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx Builds (Compare 5,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback