Samsung 400TDA/400SDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 400TDA/400SDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DB400TDZ-ZB582
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 05:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$119
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 152
56% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 343
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 56%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 141
Parallax 140
120% 143 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 129
Splatting 117
111% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
649GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 639 629 650 654 655 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 651
Write 588
Mixed 615
SusWrite 644
141% 625 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 73.1
241% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 617
DQ Mixed 652
506% 699 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 173%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 27.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 400TDA/400SDA Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 400TDA/400SDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback