Lenovo 90RCCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 90RCCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3716
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 05:05
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 806
84% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
PowerColor(148C 2381) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 36.6
20% 29.6 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 20
21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2044 2073 708 308 307 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,389
Write 2,032
Mixed 1,591
SusWrite 957
389% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 70.2
190% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,164
852% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 263%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RCCTO1WW Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 90RCCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback