HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8768
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 19:17
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 217
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 752
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 185
Parallax 187
149% 185 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 160
Splatting 136
131% 164 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 939 1242 1012 901 902 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,661
Write 1,572
Mixed 1,308
SusWrite 1,016
312% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 49.6
164% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 823
614% 819 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 216%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.2
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback