PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B38 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38) (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170628 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 10 '23 at 19:06 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 87% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
52.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 149 25 9.3 99 7.7 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 125 130 130 130 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
499GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 137 142 144 141 MB/s
|
80%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 42x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $233 |