Asus Q304UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus Q304UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q304UA
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 118
43% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 192
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 17% Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1200) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.2
4% 4 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 218 219 219 218 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 305
Write 280
Mixed 270
SusWrite 224
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 11.9
40% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 105
83% 115 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P2 0423 TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 625
6% 625 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q304UA Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback