Asrock B550 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 18:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 340
108% 201 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 936
101% 804 Pts
64-Core 1168
72% 1168 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 155
Parallax 144
114% 146 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 151
Splatting 131
111% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG41TB 1TB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,070
Write 3,707
Mixed 2,226
602% 2,667 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 84.2
290% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1414
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,274
941% 1,246 MB/s
Poor: 191% Great: 473%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
128GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 491 491 485 491 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 490
Mixed 388
SusWrite 490
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 50.6
183% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 361
274% 370 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36.4
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.7
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback