HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8768
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 16:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 752
73% 602 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 181
Parallax 201
148% 188 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 158
Splatting 132
129% 161 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 396 401 419 418 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,144
Write 1141
Mixed 978
SusWrite 417
206% 920 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 57.7
196% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 724
560% 767 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 167%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 23.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 23.4
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback