Medion E67009

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E67009  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 16:00
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 590
67% 524 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 9548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.35
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 47
43% 51.6 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 45.1
37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS300M120C 118GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0824C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 234 243 247 247 246 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 497
Write 246
Mixed 301
SusWrite 243
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 39.8
138% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 170
142% 203 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
102GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 55.1
Write 57.3
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 61.2
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 47%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 151 151 152 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 105
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 150
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 110 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 99.7
Write 95
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 110
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 67%
IS916 innostor 64GB
25GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 14 11 8 6.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 123
Write 44
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 12.8
59% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
115% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 25.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E67009 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion E67009

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback