Asus Zenbook UM6702RA_RM6702RA_BM6702RA UM6702RA_UM6702RA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Zenbook UM6702RA_RM6702RA_BM6702RA UM6702RA_UM6702RA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UM6702RA
Memory15.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 15:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 144
55% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 500
46% 387 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1EE2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.28
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.5% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 57.9
20% 39.2 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 31.6
22% 26.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
712GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 848 863 1076 1084 1080 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 1,281
Mixed 1,306
SusWrite 968
281% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 44.6
142% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 556
361% 427 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 178%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 31.1
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zenbook UM6702RA_RM6702RA_BM6702RA UM6702RA_UM6702RA Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Asus Zenbook UM6702RA_RM6702RA_BM6702RA UM6702RA_UM6702RA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback