Trigem TG DESKTOP MINI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTrigem TG DESKTOP MINI  (all builds)
MotherboardASROCK JUPITER
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 06:28
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 132
49% 106 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 167
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Device(1B0A 01D6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3
4% 3.3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.6
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 76 92 81 79 76 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 160
Write 155
Mixed 121
SusWrite 86.4
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.2
10% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: AM0P6L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 85 76 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 65.6
Write 52.9
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 76.7
39% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 549
7% 549 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback