Hp-pavilion NY639AA-ABA p6213w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion NY639AA-ABA p6213w  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 02:05
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 88.4
43% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 142
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 14.8
13% 15.2 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13.8
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo ZEUS SSD 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1205A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 42 46 41 45 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 148
Write 201
Mixed 146
SusWrite 57.9
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 24.2
71% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 90.3
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 122
89% 115 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 37%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
214GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 99 102 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 96.2
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 101
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NY639AA-ABA p6213w Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NY639AA-ABA p6213w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback