Lenovo 20221

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20221  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 365
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 9.3
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 172 159 155 167 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 239
Write 224
Mixed 212
SusWrite 170
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 23.5
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 195
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20221 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback