Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory14.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 20:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
CPU-A (00), 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 148
59% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 476
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 66.6
56% 69.3 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 66.5
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,025
Write 727
Mixed 587
172% 780 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 33.6
110% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 305
227% 304 MB/s
Poor: 163% Great: 334%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
55GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 60 63 47 61 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 52
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 56.5
39% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 57%
MG04ACA400N 4TB
545GB free
Firmware: FJ3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 123 123 122 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 103
Write 121
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 123
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33393342324737304148302D5948392020 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback