Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 175 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 264 38% 279 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 32.4 29% 38 fps	MRender 40.2 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 28.8 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot M.2 P300 512GB 1,689 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400fAA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 40 38 28 29 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 1,027 Write 154 Mixed 424 SusWrite 36.1 89% 410 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 40.2 139% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 90.3 91% 148 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 286%
Intenso Sata \|\|\| 507GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 145GB free Firmware: Q0823B SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 369 354 411 414 379 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40% Below average	Read 424 Write 353 Mixed 1.2 SusWrite 364 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.1 3% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 146GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 177 176 179 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 128 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 177 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 103%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60 12,460 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 216GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 70 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 57.6 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 70 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 4x4GB 4,177 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 35.3 106% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 36.6 SC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,052

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)