Intel H610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H610  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 13:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 180
2-Core 331
101% 193 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 974
93% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,198
74% 1,198 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 121
Parallax 125
108% 126 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.1
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS500 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 913 53 537 173 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,251
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 341
223% 995 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 27.2
186% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 384
366% 567 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 154%
Great: 216%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
220GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 15 11 5.7 8.7 6.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 8.6
4% 5.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BAS84U6DWA 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Intel H610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback