Dell PowerEdge R320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge R320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R320  (all builds)
Memory91.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 00:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 49
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 27.6
23% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 309
22% 200 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 33%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MG04ACA600E 6TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: FS3B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 32 30 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 85.4
Write 38.3
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 30.6
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B2G70QH0-YK0 6x16GB
6 of 6 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R320 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback